Monitoring-only report
Data flows in, a list of recommendations comes out, and it lands in your developers’ backlog.
Both show how AI models talk about you. The difference is what happens next: Sparkle also puts the fixes live via the Edge, without involving your CMS.
Profound is an enterprise platform that measures how often and how your brand is mentioned in AI answers. Sparkle measures that too, then executes the improvements: schema, FAQ answers, titles and /llms.txt go live via Sparkle Edge, without a release or CMS change.
In short: choose Profound if you mainly need a measurement yardstick and reporting for a large brand. Choose Sparkle if you want to go from measuring to executing without a development waitlist.
Last reviewed: 10 September 2026
A monitoring tool ends at a report. Then the real work starts: tickets, sprints, and waiting for someone to have time. Sparkle skips that step.
Data flows in, a list of recommendations comes out, and it lands in your developers’ backlog.
The same measurement, but after your approval the fix is served on the edge immediately. Your origin stays untouched.
Both tools do solid work measuring AI visibility. The differences are in execution, price level, and who they are built for.
| Area | Sparkle | Profound |
|---|---|---|
| Measure AI visibilityCitations per prompt and model | YesChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity | YesEngine coverage depends on the plan |
| Ship fixes liveFrom recommendation to production | Yes, via the EdgeSchema, FAQ, titles and /llms.txt after approval | NoRecommendations; your team executes |
| CMS change requiredRelease or plugin | NoDNS via Sparkle Edge, origin unchanged | DependsYour own stack applies the changes |
| Control crawler accessAllow or block per bot | YesRules on the edge, per bot and path | PartialAnalytics on bot traffic, no access rules |
| Classic SEO includedGoogle Search Console | YesGEO and SEO in one view | NoFocused on AI visibility |
| Entry priceLowest paid plan | €79 per month1–3 domains, 50 tracked prompts, 50 AI Action Credits | $99 per monthPer public reviews: 1 brand, limited engine coverage |
| Multiple sitesFor agencies | From the entry planAgency plan: 20 sites | Higher plansWorkspaces per brand |
| Dutch marketLanguage and support | YesDutch-language, built in Eindhoven | English-languageUS product |
Profound is not the right choice for everyone. Below, which tool fits which situation. We put ourselves first — read it with that lens.
For teams that want to know what is wrong and get it fixed. After approval, fixes go live via the Edge, without a release.
For large brands with their own analytics and content team. Deep prompt intelligence and rich reporting, with execution in-house.
Fill in a tool that offers cheap monitoring. Briefly describe who it works for and where it stops, so the page stays honest.
For teams that want AI visibility as part of a broader SEO suite. Handy if you already use such a package, less deep on GEO.
Paste your domain and see within a minute which gaps AI models hit today.
One DNS connection. Your CMS, hosting and release process stay exactly as they are.
You see every change beforehand. What you approve goes live on the edge immediately.
Entry prices are close — around eighty to a hundred euros a month. The difference is what you get: Sparkle already includes Edge execution and multiple sites in the entry plan. With a monitoring tool, also count the hours your team spends implementing recommendations.
Yes. They do not conflict: Profound keeps measuring, Sparkle executes. In practice many teams drop one after a few months because the measurement data largely overlaps.
For Edge features, yes. Your domain then runs through Sparkle Edge. Measuring, the audit and the Action Plan also work without it; then you apply fixes yourself in your CMS.
You revert DNS and everything is as it was. Sparkle does not change your origin, so nothing is left behind in your CMS or database.
ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity — both citations in answers and crawl behaviour of their bots on your site. That second half is exactly what a monitoring tool cannot see.
The audit is free and takes a minute. Only then do you decide whether to put fixes live.